Editorial Policy
At Zyvo, we are committed to producing accurate, thoughtful, and responsible content that informs, inspires, and challenges our readers. Our editorial policy outlines the principles and standards that guide our publishing process, ensuring transparency, credibility, and integrity in everything we publish.
1. Editorial Independence
Zyvo maintains full editorial independence from advertisers, sponsors, and external influences. All editorial decisions are made by our in-house team based on merit, relevance, and public interest. We do not accept payment or favours in exchange for editorial coverage.
Our content is never influenced by commercial relationships, and any potential conflicts of interest are disclosed clearly and transparently.
2. Accuracy and Fact-Checking
We strive to ensure that all information published on Zyvo is accurate, well-researched, and appropriately sourced. Where applicable, we consult subject matter experts and rely on reputable data sources to support our claims.
In the event of an error, we promptly correct or update the content and clearly indicate that a revision has been made.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
All content on Zyvo is either original or properly attributed. We do not tolerate plagiarism or misrepresentation of sources. Contributors and editors are required to respect intellectual property rights and cite their sources where appropriate.
We use industry-standard tools to check for originality and maintain strict editorial controls to ensure content integrity.
4. Editorial Tone and Style
Our editorial tone is analytical, respectful, and constructive. We aim to explore ideas, systems, and technologies with depth and nuance — without sensationalism, clickbait, or misleading headlines. All content is reviewed for clarity, readability, and consistency with our brand values.
5. Diversity of Perspectives
Zyvo values critical thinking and open dialogue. We welcome diverse viewpoints and encourage healthy debate, provided that it remains respectful and fact-based. We do not publish content that promotes discrimination, misinformation, or harmful ideologies.
We strive to represent a range of voices across disciplines, industries, and global contexts.
6. Editorial Review Process
All articles undergo a multi-step editorial process that may include:
- Research and outline review
- Fact-checking and source validation
- Peer or editorial board review (for specialised topics)
- Final edits for clarity, tone, and alignment with our publishing standards
Content may also be updated periodically to reflect new developments or corrections.
7. Sponsored Content and Partnerships
Any sponsored articles, affiliate content, or partnerships are clearly labelled as such. Sponsored content is held to the same editorial standards as our independent work and is subject to review before publication.
Transparency with our readers is fundamental to maintaining trust.
8. Feedback and Corrections
We welcome feedback from our readers. If you notice an error, have a concern about a piece we’ve published, or wish to suggest a correction, please contact us using the details below. We review all correction requests seriously and act where appropriate.
